How Do Animals Get Water In The Desert

1. Introduction

Access to a safe supply of h2o is a homo right. Fresh water sustains human life and is vital for human health. Some of the barren regions of the world lack adequate h2o supply [i,2]. Attributable to bad economics or poor infrastructure in some parts of the globe, water scarcity has become even worse. Over 2 billion people (out of a total of 7.7 billion people) live in countries experiencing high water stress [iii]. It is estimated that 31 countries (out of a total of 195) experience water stress between 25 and seventy%, where 25% is defined as the minimum threshold of h2o stress. Some other 22 countries are to a higher place 70% and are therefore under serious water stress. In some of the poorest countries, one in 10 people do not have access to a safe water supply.

It is apparent that the current supply of fresh h2o needs to exist supplemented to see the electric current and time to come needs. To find new sources of h2o supply, living nature may provide solutions. In living nature, after some 3.8 billion years of evolution, many plant and animal species in barren regions exhibit efficient solutions for water harvesting [2,4–13]. Desert plants may take to get without fresh water for years at a time. Some plants, for case, palm trees (Phoenix dactylifera L.), have adapted to the barren climate by growing long roots that tap h2o from deep underground. Some plants, such as cacti, have special means of harvesting and storing h2o. And amongst animals, the Namibian desert beetle and Moloch Horridus lizards tin can harvest fog from the air for water. Water harvesting solutions typically involve species possessing unique surface structures and chemistry on or within their bodies that help to directly the movement of water before it is evaporated to where it is consumed or stored.

In this review paper, beginning, the available water sources in deserts and an overview of desert plants and animals are presented. This is followed by a summary of water harvesting mechanisms of selected desert plants and animals, and corresponding bioinspired water harvesting mechanisms that are currently being developed in laboratories.

2. Water sources in deserts

A desert is a barren surface area of landscape where fiddling precipitation occurs and, consequently, living conditions are hostile for living nature including plant and creature life. Deserts cover most one-3rd of the Earth'south land surface surface area [8,10]. Deserts are formed past weathering processes; big variations in temperature between day and nighttime put strains on the rocks which consequently intermission in pieces. A map of the earth'southward non-polar deserts with relative degrees of aridness is shown in figure i. Desert regions on Earth can be divided into three categories according to the amount of precipitation they received [14]. In this widely accepted arrangement, extremely arid lands have at to the lowest degree 12 consecutive months without rainfall, arid lands have less than 250 mm of annual rainfall, and semi-arid lands have a hateful annual precipitation of between 250 and 500 mm. Arid and extremely arid land are deserts, and semi-barren grasslands generally are referred to as steppes. Examples of extremely arid deserts include Namib, Sahara and Atacama deserts.

Figure 1. World map of deserts with non-polar and arid lands [xiv]. (Online version in colour.)

Even so, deserts are not entirely waterless. A low corporeality of h2o is bachelor in deserts. Every bit a event, a large number of plants and animals are found in extremely barren regions, for instance in the Namib Desert. Tabular array 1 presents a listing of various plants and animals with their degree of endemism in the Namib Desert [15]. The various animals include mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, frogs, insects and arachnids.

Table 1. Numbers and proportions of known owned and nigh-endemic taxa found in the Namib Desert [15].

Collapse
	endemics	all species	endemism (%)
plants	683	4334	17
mammals	14	200	seven
birds	14	644	2
reptiles	59	250	24
fish	3	113	three
frogs	6	51	12
insects	1541	6331	24
arachnids
(spiders, scorpions, etc.)	164	1331	12

Dependent upon the desert, unlike available water sources include rainfall, rivers, lakes, oases, groundwater, metabolic h2o (in the case of animals), fog, dew and h2o vapour adsorption (above dew point). The 2 water sources which generally be fifty-fifty in the most arid deserts are fog and dew. Fog is essentially a visible aerosol consisting of tiny water aerosol suspended in air, which is institute close to the land surface or water. Thick fog is formed most coastal deserts [sixteen]. It is typically formed when warm, moist air from the land moves above the common cold water and condenses, and the winds bring the condensed moist air or fog dorsum to the land. The visibility in fog is generally limited to distances on the order of ane km. Fog contains water aerosol of diameter on the gild of ten–50 µm, with a concentration on the order of x–100 droplets per cubic centimetre [8]. The wind speed of fog is on the club of 1–5 cm southward^−one [17] to 1–10 m s⁻¹ [18]. Fog tin collect about 2–10 l m^−two day⁻¹ of water in various deserts around the globe [19]. The water collection depends on various factors including wind speed, wind direction and the difference between air temperature and dew betoken temperature.

Some other arroyo for water drove from ambient air is by dewing (or condensation). Dew is formed when warm, moist air condenses on a surface with its surface temperature below the dew point temperature [20]. It does so past nucleating nanodroplets across the surface, which coalesce and grow equally the condensation continues. The ambient temperature during desert nights is low, as low as freezing temperature [13]. Depression temperature decreases the saturated partial force per unit area of h2o vapour in the ambient air, which is desirable for a higher corporeality of h2o condensation. For example, when a flat sample is placed on a common cold substrate, water vapour in the air will condense on the surface if the partial pressure of ambience is higher than the saturation vapour pressure at the surface temperature. In addition, water vapour adsorption also occurs when the surface temperature is higher than the dew betoken temperature [21].

three. An overview of desert plants and water harvesting mechanisms

To survive, desert plants accept adapted to the extremes of heat and aridity by using physical, chemical and behavioural mechanisms [vii]. Plants that have adjusted by altering their physical structure are chosen xerophytes. Xerophytes, such as cacti, usually have special means of storing and conserving water. They often take few, small or narrow leaves, or no leaves, which reduce transpiration. Phreatophytes are plants that have adapted to barren environments by growing extremely long roots, assuasive them to acquire moisture at or near the water table. Poikilohydric desert plants live for several years, oft survive by remaining fallow during dry out periods of the year, and so springing to life when water becomes available. Other desert plants, using behavioural adaptations, accept developed a lifestyle in conformance with the seasons of greatest moisture and/or coolest temperatures. These types of plants live for only a season.

Effigy 2 presents the classification of desert plants, with examples for each classification. Plants, in general, can broadly be categorized into four classes—wildflowers, cacti and other succulents, trees and shrubs, and grasses, mosses and lichens [7]. Effigy 3 presents a montage of selected plants from each class [seven].

Figure 2. Classification of desert plants with examples. (Online version in colour.)

Figure 3. — Figure three. Montage of selected desert plants with their classification (adapted from https://www.desertusa.com/flora.htmlhttps://world wide web.desertusa.com/flora.html). (Online version in colour.)

(a) Wildflowers

Several adaptations have enabled desert plants to thrive in the heat and dryness of their habitats. Some plants will merely bloom on the rare occasions when h2o appears in the desert, lying fallow the rest of the yr. Others merely grow during rainy seasons and have short lives, such as the desert sand verbena, which grows and blooms with bright royal flowers later rainfalls. Its seeds tin can remain in the basis for months or years before growing afterwards the next rainy flavor. Some wildflowers, which include the desert lily, desert lupine, desert marigold, fairy duster, twist flower and larkspur, capitalize on fog and dew for their h2o needs [22]. The droplets become deposited on the leaves, which slowly go adsorbed.

(b) Cacti, other succulents

Succulents are the type of plant with thick, fleshy and swollen parts that are adapted to store water and minimize water loss [23]. Succulents, in general, have evolved a number of strategies for property onto this water. They tend to have a thick waxy blanket, which helps seal in moisture. They are unremarkably found in arid regions. While cacti by definition are succulents, they are often referred to separately from other succulents. These species utilise fog as a supplemental source of water [24]. A cactus species, Copiapoa haseltoniana, native to the Atacama Desert, is known to use the run off from nightly fog events to survive in what is the driest non-polar desert in the world [25]. Gymnocalycium baldianum, a cactus species in neighbouring Argentina is known to collect and transport water through microcapillaries [26]. Opuntia microdasys (bunny ears cactus) is a species of h2o-collecting cacti owned to Mexico, which features conical spines with small barbs atop that help in the collection of water [xiii,27]. Water aerosol collect on the tips of the small barbs and once they reach a disquisitional size, they move onto the conical spine. On the spine, the droplets move towards the base due to the curvature slope, providing the Laplace pressure gradient. Once at the base of the spine, the plant absorbs the water. Laplace pressure gradient is large enough that h2o droplets can defy gravity and climb up.

Another common succulent found in deserts is Trianthema hereroensis (Aizoaceae), which is a common succulent found in the coastal desert. This plant apace absorbs fog h2o through its leaves, apparently to supplement the water obtained through its roots from moisture stored in the sand. It only grows as far inland as the fog regularly penetrates. As a result of this relatively dependable water supply, it flowers and produces seeds throughout the twelvemonth and is thus an important source of food and shelter for many dune animals [28].

(c) Trees, shrubs

Desert trees such as the Joshua tree collect water on their leaves and branches from rain, fog and dew, and store it in the body and leaves. Big Joshua trees are near 10 1000 alpine and their widespread roots are about 1 thousand deep. The collected water coalesces and drips. However, trees practice not consist of a unique water harvesting mechanism.

Shrubs such as the Creosote bush take fine hairs on the leaves of the plant that intercept fog droplets where they coalesce and grow before dropping downward into the plant construction when they become too heavy and eventually accomplish the roots.

(d) Grasses, mosses, lichens

A grass owned to the Namib Desert, Stipagrostis sabulicola (Bushman grass), collects water from fog [13]. Water aerosol collect on the leaf before coalescing and running downward towards the base of the plant [29,30]. The leaves characteristic longitudinal ridges, which facilitate water menstruum [31]. Another blazon of grass, Setaria viridis, is also found to harvest water from the fog by directionally transporting water aerosol using its grooves and conical shape [32].

Syntrichia caninervis (Mitten Steppe Screw Moss) is one of the most abundant desert mosses in the world and thrives in extreme environments with limited h2o resources (dew, fog, snow and rain) [33,34]. Syntrichia caninervis has a unique accommodation. Information technology uses a tiny hair (awn) on the end of each leaf to collect h2o, in addition to that collected by the leaves themselves. Water droplets collect on their barbs which serve as collection depots. When droplets become large enough, they motility down to micro-/nanogrooves along the length of awn to its base onto the leaf.

Lichens comprise a mucus living in a symbiotic relationship with an alga or cyanobacterium (or both in some instances) [8]. Examples include Teloschistes capensis, Alectoria, Santessonia hereroensis, Caloplaca elegantissima, Xanthomaculina hottentotta and Xanthomaculina convolute. Lichens are arable in both hot and common cold deserts. They grade crusts on exposed rock, and through the release of chemicals deliquesce the substrate to grade soil. Loftier levels of lichen biodiversity appear to exist an splendid measure out of air quality. During periods of farthermost drought, lichens become dry and announced to be expressionless, but with pelting they blot water and become dark-green again. Lichens are poikilohydric, which means they have the capacity to tolerate aridity to low cell or tissue h2o content and to recover from it without physiological damage. They practice not have h2o-storing tissues or a waxy cuticle [8].

A summary of water harvesting mechanisms used by selected plants from fog and dew is presented in table 2. Figure iv summarizes selected water harvesting mechanisms used by selected plants through schematics. The selected plants are desert lily (wildflower), bunny ears cactus (cactus), creosote bush (shrub) and Namib grass (grass).

Figure 4. — Effigy 4. Water harvesting machinery of selected desert plants. (Online version in colour.)

Table ii. Summary of selected water harvesting mechanisms by desert plants from fog and dew.

Collapse
found class	species	surface structures or chemistry	drove mechanism	references
wildflower	Tripteris oppositifolium	rough surface	hydrophilic leaves and adsorption	[22]
	(Asteraceae)
	Lampranthus hoerleinianus			[22]
	(Aizoaceae)
	Grielum grandiflorum			[22]
	(Neuradaceae)
	Oxalis eckloniana			[22]
	(Oxalidaceae)
cactus^a (succulents)	Opuntia microdasys	conical geometry and grooves	water droplets get deposited on the spine, which coalesce, grow and move downwardly onto the spine, towards the base, due to Laplace pressure level slope where they are absorbed	[24,27,35]
	Ferocactus latispinus
	Copiapoa haseltoniana			[24,36]
	Discocactus horstii			[36–39]
	Turbinicarpus schmiedickeanus klinkerianus			[36–39]
	Mammillaria theresae			[36–39]
	Eulychnias			[xl]
	Copiapoa cinerea var. haseltoniana			[41]
	Ferocactus wislizenii			[41]
	Mammillaria columbiana subsp. yucatanensis			[41]
	Parodia mammulosa			[41]
other succulents	Trianthema hereroensis (Aizooceae)		absorb water through leaves and quick translocation to the roots	[28,42]
shrub	Larrea tridentata		water droplets grow on tiny hairs before dropping downwards further into the plant structure when they become too heavy and eventually reaching the roots	[10]
	(Creosote bush-league)
	Psorothamnus arborescens
	(Mojave Indigo bush-league)
	Arthraerua leubnitziae			[42]
	(Pencil bush)
Grass (Namib)^a	Stipagrostis sabulicola	grooves	water droplets are channelled down the hydrophilic leaves towards the base of the plant and somewhen reaching the roots	[30,31,42–44]
Moss	Syntrichia caninervis	grooves	water droplets collect on barbs which serve every bit collection depots. When droplets become large enough, they move down to micro-/nanogrooves along the length of awn to its base of operations onto the leaf	[33,34]
Lichens	Teloschistes capensis		blot	[45]
	Alectoria			[45]
	Santessonia hereroensis			[45]
	Caloplaca elegantissima			[45]
	Xanthomaculina hottentotta			[45]
	Xanthomaculina convoluta			[45]
	Xanthoria elegans			[46]
	Brodoa atrofusca			[46]
	Umbilicaria cylindrica			[46]

4. An overview of desert animals and water harvesting mechanisms

In club to survive in deserts, animals use behavioural, physiological and anatomical adaptations [ten]. The common adaptations include feeding on other animals and drinking from water sources such as rivers and lakes for fulfilling water needs. Some other is by seeking cool areas (shade, soil, rocks, caves, mines, canyons, burrows and higher elevations) during the hottest time of the day to avoid whatsoever water loss due to evaporation, perspiration and breathing. Some other is existence nocturnal to harvest water from fog and dew in nights because temperatures are depression and humidity is high. In this section, unique water harvesting mechanisms used by desert animals are discussed.

Effigy 5 presents the nomenclature of the desert animals, with examples of each classification. These include vertebrates and invertebrates. Vertebrates tin can broadly exist categorized into five classes: mammals, birds, reptiles, fishes and amphibians [7]. Figures 6 and 7 nowadays montages of selected vertebrates and invertebrates, respectively [7].

Figure 5. Nomenclature of desert animals with examples. (Online version in color.)

Figure 6. — Effigy 6. Montage of selected desert animals (vertebrates) with their classification (adapted from https://www.desertusa.com/animals.htmlhttps://www.desertusa.com/animals.html). (Online version in colour.)

Figure 7. — Figure vii. Montage of selected desert animals (invertebrates) (adjusted from https://www.desertusa.com/animals.htmlhttps://www.desertusa.com/animals.html). (Online version in colour.)

(a) Mammals

The mammals are the grade of vertebrate animals primarily characterized by the presence of mammary glands in the female which produce milk for the nourishment of young; the presence of hair or fur; and which have endothermic or 'warm-blooded' bodies. Large mammals survive on rivers and lakes for their h2o needs. In the case of desert elephants, for case, Loxodonta Africana holds water on their skin which provides many benefits [48–50]. They have an intricate network of crevices on their skin surface. These micrometre-wide channels heighten the effectiveness of thermal regulation (by h2o retention) as well as protection against parasites and intense solar radiation by mud adherence. This fine pattern of channels allows spreading and retentiveness of five–10 times more water on the elephant skin than on a flat surface, impeding dehydration and improving thermal regulation over a longer period of time.

(b) Birds

Birds, likewise known as Aves, are a group of endothermic vertebrates, characterized past feathers, toothless beaked jaws, the laying of hard-shelled eggs, a high metabolic charge per unit, a four-chambered heart and a strong yet lightweight skeleton [10,51]. Examples of flight species include sandgrouse and elf owls. Male sandgrouse, to satisfy the thirst of newly hatched chicks, bring water dorsum to the nest by carrying it in their feathers [52]. In the absurd of the desert morning time, the male flies up to 30 km to a shallow h2o hole, then wades in up to his belly. The h2o is collected by 'rocking'. The bird shifts its body side to side and repeatedly shakes the belly feathers in the water. Make full-upwards tin can take as long as fifteen min. Owing to coiled pilus-like extensions on the feathers of the underparts, a sandgrouse tin can soak upwards and transport on the social club of 25 ml of water, about ii tablespoons. Once the male person has flown back beyond the desert with his life-giving cargo, the sandgrouse chicks crowd effectually him and use their bills to swallow that water.

(c) Reptiles

Reptiles are animals in the class Reptilia. Three of the normally known desert reptiles are snakes, tortoises and lizards. Reptiles, like to mammals, mostly harvest their water via their food and/or usually but lick and drink h2o from stones or vegetation [53]. For example, the desert turtle, Gopherus agassizii, drinks rain from ditches which it has dug itself. Reptiles also avoid h2o loss by beingness inactive during the hottest times of the twenty-four hours. Their waterproof pare helps them to minimize h2o loss through evaporation. They also simultaneously withhold and/or drink any h2o bachelor.

(i) Snakes

Water harvesting snakes, for example, emerge from their dens or whatever potential roofing during pelting showers and coil up in the open. Past coiling upward, they bring their trunk loops into close contact with each other and h2o is restrained in the formed shallows between the loops [53]. Some species also exhibit a dorsoventral flattening of the body, probably to increase the exposed surface area. With the snout continuously in contact with the shallows and the caput moving contrary to the overlap of scales, the collected water is ingested.

(two) Lizard

In contrast to snakes, several species of lizards are not able to lick water from their bodies. They likewise flatten their trunk surface to enlarge the exposed surface area [53]. Furthermore, they raise their abdomen past splaying and extending their legs and lowering their head and tail. Owing to gravity and capillary activity, whatever striking droplet thus runs down the body towards head and snout to be ingested. Special skin structures, comprising a microstructured surface with capillary channels betwixt overlapping (imbricate) scales, enable lizards to collect water efficiently. In some lizards, such as the Phrynosoma cornutum (Texas horned lizard), water aerosol applied to their body surface testify a preferred spreading management, transporting the h2o towards the rima oris for ingestion. This passive directional transport is enabled by asymmetric and interconnected channels between the scales.

(iii) Tortoises

A similar posture is adopted by h2o harvesting tortoises [53]. However, they press the front limbs against their head, probably to lead the h2o from their crush towards their snout. Any flattening of their trunk is, apparently, inhibited past their rigid protection.

(d) Fish

Fish species in desert rivers are adapted to live in highly fluctuating ecosystems [54,55]. One of the known species of desert fish is Cyprinodon macularius (desert pupfish) [7]. Some of these fishes tin tolerate temperatures between approximately four°C and 45°C and salinities ranging from 0 to lxx parts per yard, exceeding the tolerances of virtually all other freshwater fish. The desert pupfish can also survive dissolved-oxygen concentrations as depression equally 0.xiii ppm. Nonetheless, they exercise not consist of water harvesting mechanisms.

(e) Amphibians

Amphibians are ectothermic, tetrapod vertebrates of the class Amphibia. Examples include toads and frogs. Amphibians have developed morphological and behavioural adaptations capable of acting together to maintain the hydric balance [10,56,57]. Amphibians typically absorb water through the skin. For example, surrounded by damp soil in a deep burrow, the toad acts like a sponge and draws water into itself from the soil. Some hylid toads of the genus Anaxyrus (eastward.g. A. boreas, A. woodhousii, A. punctatus) take granular skin which contains numerous grooves in which capillary forces occur that suck water from the surface. A granular ventral peel absorbs more efficiently than polish skin. Their accumulated water is transported fifty-fifty to the dorsal torso parts, about likely to maximize effective wetting of the skin to enlarge the area for water uptake and to prevent dehydration of the epidermis.

Some hylid frogs, such equally Litoria caerulea (Australian light-green treefrog) and Phyllomedusa sauvagii (waxy monkey treefrog) survive on water aerosol from the condensation of water vapour [58,59]. The required thermal slope is accomplished by the ectothermic backdrop of the species and temporal changes in the microhabitat. As ectotherms, the frogs cool down in the open up environs. Yet, when they enter warm and humid tree holes, the temperature divergence leads to condensation on the colder body surfaces of the frog. Condensation rates upwards to 3 mg cm⁻² on the body surface at a temperature differential of 15°C and duration of 20 min have been reported. Such a rate is higher than water loss by evaporation [59].

(f) Invertebrates

Examples of invertebrates include insects and crustaceans. Many deserts have more insect species than all other animal groups combined. Insects mutual to deserts include beetles, flat bugs, grasshoppers, ants, bees and butterflies. They have developed many adaptations and behaviours to help them survive heat, drought and predators in the desert. For example, the thick exoskeletons of beetles assistance minimize water loss, and the cavities beneath their forewings trap moisture. Crustaceans are a group of aquatic animals. Common crustaceans to deserts include fairy shrimp, snails and wharf roaches.

(i) Beetles

The Namib Desert in southern Africa is one of the about arid regions in the world with an average annual rainfall of only about 18 mm, and information technology is not uncommon to experience consecutive years with no rainfall at all [60]. Stenocara gracilipes and Onymacris unguicularis are beetles native to this region. The beetles survive as a result of the drove of water from fog. The first observation of fog harvesting in the Namib Desert was made by Hamilton & Seely with beetles emerging during nocturnal fogs and lowering their heads while oriented into the current of air [61]. Water was plant to trickle down the body of the protrude and into the mouth.

The back of the beetle comprises a random array of 0.5 mm bore bumps spaced 0.5–i.5 mm autonomously. The bumps are smooth, while the surrounding surface area is covered with microstructured wax. Water from the fog is observed to land on the bumps and aerosol begin to grow. The droplet continues to grow (up to on the lodge of v mm) until the weight of the droplet overcomes the capillary force and the droplet detaches and rolls down the tilted beetle'south back [62]. The bumps are establish to be hydrophilic while the background wax is hydrophobic.

Some other beetle, similar to the Namib beetle, known as the blossom beetle, has a similar water harvesting mechanism [63]. This large insect tin can grow upwardly to 11 cm long and is well known for its distinctive black and white shield, which are hydrophobic and hydrophilic, respectively.

(ii) Flat bugs

The South American flat bug species, Dysodius lunatus and Dysodius magnus, collect water for camouflage, in order to reduce their surface reflectivity, rather than for the purpose of rehydration [64,65]. Immediate spreading of water droplets is facilitated by chemical and structural properties of the integument. Dissimilar most other insects, the cuticle of these bugs is covered by a hydrophilic wax layer imparted by the amphiphilic component erucamide [65]. In the flat bug species D. lunatus and D. magnus, pillar-like surface structures support the hydrophilic wetting properties and spreading of water. Spreading on the surface is slower than within intersegmental channels, simply energetically favourable. Hence, a passive spreading of h2o over the body surface is enabled [65].

(iii) Crustaceans

Crustaceans are a grouping of aquatic animals that include fairy shrimps, snails and wharf roaches [7,ten]. Fairy shrimp are tiny freshwater crustaceans related to lobsters, shrimps and crabs. Fairy shrimp spend their entire lives in ephemeral pools, ofttimes located in very remote areas. Snails, for case, use their mucus to stick their shells to a hard substrate such as the underside of a shady rock. The mucus dries, creating a waterproof seal around the shell and keeping the snail moist inside for months [66,67]. A number of crustacean wharf roaches, such as Ligia exotica and Ligia oceanica, passively collect water from wet surfaces of their coastal habitat [68,69]. Water is so transported in open structures of the cuticle of the legs, which human activity as capillaries. Farther exam has revealed more detail: hair- and paddle-like microstructures on 2 adjacent legs (i.e. pereiopods VI and VII) collect and ship the adhered water; the water is then transported further along with the swimming limbs (pleopods) and to the hindgut, near the anus, for uptake by absorption [69,lxx]. Collected water as well establishes a water film on the integument and evaporation is regularly used for thermoregulation [68].

A summary of water harvesting mechanisms used by selected animals from various water sources is presented in tables iii and 4 for vertebrates and invertebrates, respectively. Figure 8a,b summarizes water harvesting mechanisms used past selected vertebrates and invertebrates, respectively. The selected vertebrates are elephant (mammals), sandgrouse (birds), lizard (reptiles) and toad (amphibians). The selected invertebrate is Namib beetle (insects).

Figure 8. H2o harvesting mechanism of selected desert animals: (a) vertebrates and (b) invertebrates. (Online version in colour.)

Table 3. Summary of selected water harvesting mechanisms used past desert animals (vertebrates) (adapted from [57]).

Collapse
brute class	species	water source	surface structures or chemical science	collection mechanism	references
mammals (elephants)	Loxodonta africana	open up water/lakes	ridges/grooves	skin-wetting backdrop, capillarity	[48]
birds (sandgrouse)	Pterocles bicinctus	open up water/lakes	hairy feather construction	storage between feathers, direct drinking by chicks	[52]
	Pterocles namaqua				[71]
reptiles (snakes)	Crotalus atrox	pelting		accumulation of collected water	[72]
	Crotalus mitchellii pyrrhus				[73]
	Crotalus viridis concolor				[74]
	Crotalus s. scutulatus				[75]
	Bothrops moojeni				[76]
	Bitis peringueyi	rain, fog			[77,78]
reptiles (lizards)	Phrynosoma cornutum	moist substrate, rain	honeycomb-like micro-structure, channels between the scales	send in channels between scales from all body parts to rima oris for drinking	[79–81]
	Phrynosoma modestum				[82]
	Phrynosoma platyrhinos				[83,84]
	Phrynocephalus arabicus				[85]
	Phrynocephalus helioscopus				[86]
	Phrynocephalus horvathi				[87]
	Trapelus flavimaculatus				[88]
	Trapelus pallidus				[88]
	Trapelus mutabilis				[88]
	Moloch horridus				[114–92]
	Uromastyx spinipes	rain	channels betwixt the scales		[93]
	Pogona vitticeps				[94]
	Aporosaura anchietae	fog		fog basking	[77]
reptiles (tortoises)	Psammobates tentorius trimeni	rain	large ridges of the carapace	gravity-facilitated transport on the surface to mouth for drinking	[95]
	Kinixys homeana				[95]
	Homopus areolatus				[95]
amphibians (toads)	Anaxyrus boreas	moist substrate	ridges, channels	skin wetting and capillary transport to replenish the evaporative loss	[56,58,96]
	Anaxyrus woodhousii				[56]
	Anaxyrus punctatus				[96,97]
amphibians (treefrogs)	Phyllomedusa sauvagii	humidity, dew	hygroscopic secretion, slightly granular skin	transcutaneous uptake	[58,98]
	Litoria caerulea				[58,59]

Table 4. Summary of selected water harvesting mechanisms by desert animals (invertebrates) (adapted from [57]).

Collapse
animal grade	species	water source	surface structures or chemistry	collection mechanism	references
insects (beetles)	Onymacris unguicularis	fog	hydrophobic body covered with wax-free hydrophilic bumps	wetting properties of elytra, gravity	[43,61,99]
	Onymacris bicolor				[43,99]
	Stenocara sp.				[62]
insects (apartment bugs)	Dysodius lunatus	pelting	hydrophilic waxes, spine microstructures, channels	reducing reflectivity, aiding camouflage	[65]
	Dysodius magnus				[65]
Crustacea (wharf roaches)	Ligia exotica	moist substrate	channels betwixt pilus-similar and paddle-like protrusions	thermoregulation or transport to hindgut for uptake	[69,70]
	Ligia oceanica				[68]

5. Lessons from nature and water harvesting techniques

Nature uses diverse mechanisms to harvest h2o. A combination of surface construction and chemical science is used to achieve efficient interception, transport and collection of h2o. Tabular array 5 summarizes selected lessons from nature. Based on these lessons, various studies have been carried out to develop various bioinspired surfaces. Table 6 summarizes selected water harvesting techniques developed in laboratories.

Table 5. Summary of selected lessons from nature with potential in a commercial application.

Collapse
lesson learned	species
heterogeneous wettability	beetle
laplace pressure slope	cactus
grooves	grass, cactus, moss, elephant, lizard, toad
trap h2o aerosol	bird
coalescence and gravity	shrub

Table six. Summary of selected h2o harvesting techniques developed in laboratories.

Collapse
lesson learned	surface	comments	references
heterogeneous wettability	flat surface with superhydrophilic spots over the superhydrophobic surface	heterogeneously wettable surface collects more water than homogeneously wettable surface	[100]
	rectangular and triangular patterns	heterogeneity moves a complete droplet from low-wettable region to high-wettable region	[101]
	cone	heterogeneously wettable cone collects more water than homogeneously wettable cone	[100,102]
laplace pressure level gradient	triangular pattern	triangle helps in transporting droplet from tip to base	[103–106]
	cone	cone helps in transporting droplet from tip to base.	[100,102,107–109]
grooves	cylinder and cone	grooves assistance in increasing the water collection rate	[100,102,110]

Heterogeneous wettability is used by invertebrates such as Namib beetles to harvest water. A protrude crush comprises a random array of bumps. These bumps are hydrophilic, while the residual of the protrude back is hydrophobic. Therefore, water droplets collect on these bumps and one time they are large enough, travel over the body of the protrude and into its mouth. Similar morphology has been fabricated over a flat surface and information technology was found that a beetle-inspired heterogeneous surface collects more h2o than flat surfaces with homogeneous wettability [100,111,112]. This is because of the heterogeneity, droplets can slide/roll at a faster rate, and maintain a spherical droplet shape, leading to less evaporation. In addition, rectangular and triangular patterns [101], and cones [100,102] have been fabricated using heterogeneous wettability. On these surfaces, a droplet is driven from a depression wettable region to a loftier wettable region. It was constitute that heterogeneity drives droplet faster in a triangular blueprint and cones compared with homogeneously wettable surfaces.

Laplace pressure level gradient is used past plants such equally cacti having conical structures to ship droplets faster. The conical shape drives a droplet from tip to the base of operations, because the underlying curvature gradient creates a Laplace pressure gradient between ii ends of the droplet. Cactus-inspired water harvesters have been fabricated using triangular patterns [101,103–106] and cones [100,102,107–109] demonstrating fast transportation and high h2o collection.

Grooves are used for channeling water by various plants including desert grass, cactus and moss, and diverse animals including elephants, lizards and toads. Grooves fabricated on cylinders and cones take demonstrated an increment in water collection rates compared with an ungrooved cylinder and cone [100,102,110].

Water is trapped between two proximal surfaces, as in the case of sandgrouse birds. Owing to coiled hair-like extensions on the feathers of the underparts, a sandgrouse can soak up and transport h2o.

The hierarchical structure of plants such equally shrubs helps in the intercepting of a larger number of droplets, which later on coalescence with each other and fall due to gravity.

6. Conclusion and outlook

A systematic review has been conducted on various desert plants and animals. For a selected species, the torso structure and water harvesting mechanisms used past them are identified. Mechanisms learned from these species are summarized and current literature on water harvesting techniques is also discussed.

Data accessibility

This article has no boosted data.

Authors' contribution

D.M. performed the literature search and wrote the outset draft and D.Yard. and B.B. participated equally in planning, execution and editing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

Nosotros received no funding for this written report.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Prof Kerstin Koch, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Kleve, Germany and Prof Wilhelm Barthlott, Academy of Bonn, Bonn, Germany for critical review of the manuscript.

Footnotes

1 contribution of 11 to a theme issue 'Bioinspired materials and surfaces for light-green scientific discipline and technology (part 3)'.

References

1.

Bearding. 2015 Progress on sanitation and drinking water . Geneva, Switzerland: UNICEF and World Health Organization, WHO Printing. See http://files.unicef.org/publications/files/Progress_on_Sanitation_and_Drinking_Water_2015_Update_.pdf. Google Scholar
ii.
Brownish PS, Bhushan B
. 2016 Bioinspired materials for water supply and management: water collection, water purification and separation of water from oil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374 , 20160135. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0135) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
3.

Anonymous. 2019 The united nations world water development report 2019: leaving no i behind. Paris, France: UNESCO World Water Assessment Program. Encounter https://en.unesco.org/themes/water-security/wwap/wwdr/2019. Google Scholar
4.
Cloudsley-Thompson JL, Chadwick MJ
. 1964 Life in deserts . Philadelphia, PA: Dufour Editions. Google Scholar
v.
Axelrod DI
. 1979 Age and origin of Sonoran Desert vegetation . San Francisco, CA: California Academy of Sciences. Google Scholar
6.
Costa G
. 1995 Behavioural adaptations of desert animals . Berlin, Germany: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar
7.
8.
Mares MA
(ed) 1999 Encyclopedia of deserts . Norman, OK: Academy of Oklahoma. Google Scholar
9.
Van Rheede van Oudtshoorn K, Van Rooyen MW
. 1999 Dispersal biology of desert plants . Berlin, Frg: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar
10.
Harris N
. 2003 Atlas of the world'south deserts . New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group. Google Scholar
11.
Bredeson C
. 2009 Baby animals of the desert . Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers. Google Scholar
12.
White potato JA
. 2012 Desert animal adaptations . North Mankata, MN: Capstone Printing. Google Scholar
xiii.
Bhushan B
. 2019 Bioinspired water drove methods to supplement h2o supply. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20190119. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0119) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
14.
Meigs P
. 1953 World distribution of arid and semi-arid homoclimates. In Reviews of research on arid zone hydrology , pp. 203–209. Paris, France: Un Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation, Arid Zone Programme. Google Scholar
fifteen.
Simmons RE, Griffin M, Griffin RE, Marais East, Kolberg H
. 1998 Endemism in Namibia: patterns, processes and predictions. Biodivers. Conserv. 7 , 513–530. (doi:10.1023/A:1008879712736) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
16.
Meigs P
. 1966 Geography of coastal deserts . Paris, French republic: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), NS.64/Iii.33/A. Google Scholar
17.
Anonymous. 1999 Fog, Dew and Snowfall Harvesting. In Sourcebook of alternative technologies for freshwater augumentation in Africa . Norwich, UK: Jotter Part Books. Google Scholar
xviii.
Hiatt C, Fernandez D, Potter C
. 2012 Measurements of fog h2o deposition on the California central coast. Atmos. Clim. Sci. 02 , 525. (doi:10.4236/acs.2012.24047) Google Scholar
19.
Fessehaye Chiliad, Abdul-Wahab SA, Savage MJ, Kohler T, Gherezghiher T, Hurni H
. 2014 Fog-h2o collection for community use. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 29 , 52–62. (doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.063) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
xx.
Stephan K
. 1992 Heat transfer in condensation and humid , 1st edn. New York, NY: Springer. See https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-52457-8#toc. Crossref, Google Scholar
21.
Agam N, Berliner PR
. 2006 Dew formation and water vapor adsorption in semi-arid environments—a review. J. Arid Environ. 65 , 572–590. (doi:ten.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.09.004) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
22.
Von Hase A, Cowling RM, Ellis AG.
2006 Petal movement in cape wildflowers protects pollen from exposure to moisture. Plant Ecol. 184 , 75–87. (doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9053-eight) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
23.
Ogburn RM, Edwards EJ
. 2009 Anatomical variation in Cactaceae and relatives: trait lability and evolutionary innovation. Am. J. Bot. 96 , 391–408. (doi:10.3732/ajb.0800142) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
24.
Mooney HA, Gulmon SL, Weisser PJ
. 1977 Environmental adaptations of the atacaman desert cactus Copiapoa haseltoniana . Flora 166 , 117–124. (doi:10.1016/S0367-2530(17)32124-ii) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
25.
26.
Liu C, Xue Y, Chen Y, Zheng Y
. 2015 Effective directional self-gathering of drops on spine of cactus with splayed capillary arrays. Sci. Rep. 5 , 17757. (doi:ten.1038/srep17757) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
27.
Ju J, Bai H, Zheng Y, Zhao T, Fang R, Jiang 50
. 2012 A multi-structural and multi-functional integrated fog collection system in cactus. Nat. Commun. 3 , 1247. (doi:10.1038/ncomms2253) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
28.
Seely MK, de Vos MP, Louw GN.
1977 Fog inhibition, satellite beast and unusual leaf structure in a Namib Desert dune plant Trianthema hereroensis . Southward. Afr. J. Sci. 73 , 169–172. ISI, Google Scholar
29.
Louw GN, Seely MK
. 1980 Exploitation of fog water by a perennial Namib dune grass, Stipagrotis sabulicola . S. Afr. J. Sci. 76 , 38–39. ISI, Google Scholar
30.
Ebner M, Miranda T, Roth-Nebelsick A
. 2011 Efficient fog harvesting by Stipagrostis sabulicola (Namib dune bushman grass). J. Arid. Environ. 75 , 524–531. (doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.01.004) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
31.
Roth-Nebelsick Aet al.
2012 Leaf surface structures enable the endemic Namib desert grass Stipagrostis sabulicola to irrigate itself with fog water. J. Royal Soc. Interface 9 , 1965–1974. (doi:ten.1098/rsif.2011.0847) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
32.
Xue Y, Wang T, Shi Westward, Sun 50, Zheng Y
. 2014 H2o collection abilities of green bristlegrass bristle. RSC Adv. 4 , forty 837–40 840. (doi:10.1039/C4RA06661H) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
33.
Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott West
. 2008 Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of establish surfaces. Soft Matter 4 , 1943–1963. (doi:10.1039/B804854A) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
34.
Pan Z, Pitt WG, Zhang Y, Wu Due north, Tao Y, Truscott TT
. 2016 The upside-down water drove system of Syntrichia caninervis . Nat. Plants 2 , 16076. (doi:x.1038/nplants.2016.76) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
35.
Bhushan B
. 2018 Biomimetics: bioinspired hierarchical-structured surfaces for light-green scientific discipline and technology , 3rd edn. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. Run into www.springer.com/us/book/9783319716756. Crossref, Google Scholar
36.
Nobel PS
. 2003 Ecology biology of agaves and cacti , 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Printing. Google Scholar
37.
Schill R, Barthlott Westward, Ehler N
. 1973 Cactus spines under the electron scanning microscope. Cact. Succ. J. 45 , 175–185. Google Scholar
38.
Schill R, Barthlott W
. 1973 Kakteendornen als wasserabsorbierende Organe. Naturwissenschaften 60 , 202–203. (doi:10.1007/BF00599438) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
39.
Barthlott W, Capesius I
. 1974 Wasserabsorption durch blatt- und sproßorgane einiger Xerophyten. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 72 , 443–455. (doi:ten.1016/S0044-328X(74)80065-half dozen) Crossref, Google Scholar
xl.
Yetman D
. 2007 The great cacti: ethnobotany and biogeography . Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona Press. Google Scholar
41.
Malik FT, Clement RM, Gethin DT, Beysens D, Cohen RE, Krawszik W, Parker AR
. 2015 Dew harvesting efficiency of four species of cacti. Bioinspir. Biomim. x , 036005. (doi:ten.1088/1748-3190/10/3/036005) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
42.
Van Damme P.
1991 Plant ecology of the Namib Desert. Afrika Focus 7 , 355–400. (doi:x.21825/af.v7i4.5854) Crossref, Google Scholar
43.
Seely MK
. 1979 Irregular fog as a water source for desert dune beetles. Oecologia 42 , 213–227. (doi:x.1007/BF00344858) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
44.
Norgaard T, Ebner M, Dacke M
. 2012 Animal or plant: which is the improve fog water collector? PLoS ONE 7 , e34603. (doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0034603) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
45.
Lange OL, Meyer A, Ullmann I, Zellner H
. 1991 Microclimate atmospheric condition, water content and photosynthesis of lichens in the coastal fog zone of the Namib desert: measurements in the autumn. Flora 185 , 233–266. (doi:10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30481-4) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
46.
Reiter R, Höftberger 1000, Allan Green TG, Türk R
. 2008 Photosynthesis of lichens from lichen-dominated communities in the alpine/nival belt of the Alps – II: laboratory and field measurements of CO₂ commutation and water relations. Flora 203 , 34–46. (doi:10.1016/j.flora.2007.09.002) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
47.
Malik FT, Clement RM, Gethin DT, Krawszik W, Parker AR
. 2014 Nature's moisture harvesters: a comparative review. Bioinspir. Biomim. 9 , 031002. (doi:10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/031002) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
48.
Lillywhite HB, Stein BR
. 1987 Surface sculpturing and water retention of elephant pare. J. Zool. 211 , 727–734. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb04483.x) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
49.

Bearding. 2016Mammals in the Desert. adventurepublications.net. See http://adventurepublications.net/2016/12/28/desert/ (accessed half-dozen November 2019). Google Scholar
l.
Martins AF, Bennett NC, Clavel Due south, Groenewald H, Hensman Due south, Hoby S, Joris A, Manger PR, Milinkovitch MC
. 2018 Locally-curved geometry generates bending cracks in the African elephant skin. Nat. Commun. ix , 1–8. (doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06257-3) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
51.

Anonymous. 1995Discover and learn well-nigh birds | desert birds: how practice birds drink water? Part one. Encounter https://world wide web.birds.com/desert-birds-how-practice-birds-drink-h2o-role-1/ (accessed six Nov 2019). Google Scholar
52.
Cade TJ, Maclean GL
. 1967 Transport of water past developed sandgrouse to their young. Condor 69 , 323–343. (doi:10.2307/1366197) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
53.
Joel A-C, Buchberger G, Comanns P
. 2017 Moisture-harvesting reptiles: a review. In Functional surfaces in biology Three: diverseness of the physical phenomena (eds
Gorb SN, Gorb EV
), pp. 93–106. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar
54.
Unmack PJ
. 2001 Fish persistence and fluvial geomorphology in key Commonwealth of australia. J. Arid Environ. 49 , 653–669. (doi:x.1006/jare.2001.0813) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
55.
Clavero K, Esquivias J, Qninba A, Riesco M, Calzada J, Ribeiro F, Fernández Due north, Delibes M
. 2015 Fish invading deserts: not-native species in arid Moroccan rivers. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 25 , 49–60. (doi:10.1002/aqc.2487) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
56.
Lillywhite HB, Licht P
. 1974 Movement of h2o over toad skin: functional office of epidermal sculpturing. Copeia 1974 , 165–171. (doi:10.2307/1443019) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
57.
Comanns P
. 2018 Passive water collection with the integument: mechanisms and their biomimetic potential. J. Exp. Biol. 221 , jeb153130. (doi:10.1242/jeb.153130) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
58.
Toledo RC, Jared C
. 1993 Cutaneous adaptations to water residual in amphibians. Comp. Biochem. Physiol A 105 , 593–608. (doi:10.1016/0300-9629(93)90259-7) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
59.
Tracy CR, Laurence N, Christian KA
. 2011 Condensation onto the peel equally a means for water gain by tree frogs in tropical Australia. Am. Nat. 178 , 553–558. (doi:10.1086/661908) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
60.
Shanyengana ES, Henschel JR, Seely MK, Sanderson RD
. 2002 Exploring fog as a supplementary water source in Namibia. Atmos. Res. 64 , 251–259. (doi:10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00096-0) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
61.
Hamilton WJ, Seely MK
. 1976 Fog basking by the Namib Desert protrude, Onymacris unguicularis . Nature 262 , 284–285. (doi:10.1038/262284a0) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
62.
Parker AR, Lawrence CR
. 2001 Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414 , 33–34. (doi:10.1038/35102108) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
63.
Godeau Grand, Godeau R-P, Orange F, Szczepanski CR, Guittard F, Darmanin T.
2018 Variation of Goliathus orientalis (Moser, 1909) elytra nanostructurations and their impact on wettability. Biomimetics 3 , 6. (doi:10.3390/biomimetics3020006) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
64.
Silberglied R, Aiello A
. 1980 Cover-up by integumentary wetting in bark bugs. Science 207 , 773–775. (doi:10.1126/science.207.4432.773) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
65.
Hischen Fet al.
2017 Adaptive camouflage: what can be learned from the wetting behaviour of the tropical flat bugs Dysodius lunatus and Dysodius magnus . Biol. Open half-dozen , 1209–1218. (doi:ten.1242/bio.026070) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
66.
Yom-Tov Y
. 1971 The biology of two desert snails Trochoidea (Xerocrassa) seetzeni and Sphincterochila boissieri . Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 20 , 231–248. (doi:10.1080/00212210.1971.10688336) Google Scholar
67.
Degen AA, Leeper A, Shachak M
. 1992 The consequence of slope direction and population density on water influx in a desert snail, Trochoidea seetzenii . Funct. Ecol. 6 , 160–166. (doi:10.2307/2389750) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
68.
Hoese B
. 1981 Morphologie und Funktion des Wasserleitungssystems der terrestrischen Isopoden (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscoidea). Zoomorphology 98 , 135–167. (doi:10.1007/BF00310433) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
69.
Horiguchi H, Hironaka 1000, Meyer-Rochow VB, Hariyama T
. 2007 Water uptake via two pairs of specialized legs in Ligia exotica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Biol. Balderdash. 213 , 196–203. (doi:ten.2307/25066635) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
lxx.
Ishii Det al.
2013 Water transport mechanism through open capillaries analyzed past direct surface modifications on biological surfaces. Sci. Rep. 3 , 3024. (doi:x.1038/srep03024) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
71.
Joubert CSW, Maclean GL
. 1973 The structure of the water-holding feathers of the Namaqua Sandgrouse. Zool. Afr. 8 , 141–152. (doi:ten.1080/00445096.1973.11448511) Crossref, Google Scholar
72.
Repp RA, Schuett GW
. 2008 Western diamond-backed rattlesnakes, Crotalus atrox (Serpentes: Viperidae), proceeds water by harvesting and drinking rain, sleet, and snow. Southwest. Nat. 53 , 108–114. (doi:ten.1894/0038-4909(2008)53[108:WDRCAS]2.0.CO;ii) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
73.
Glaudas 10
. 2009 Rain-harvesting by the Southwestern speckled rattlesnake (Crotalus mitchellii pyrrhus). Southwest. Nat. 54 , 518–521. (doi:10.1894/WL-23.1) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
74.
Ashton KG, Johnson J
. 1998 Crotalus viridis concolor (midget faded rattlesnake): drinking from peel. Herpetol. Rev. 29 , 170. Google Scholar
75.
Cardwell MD
. 2006 Rain-harvesting in a wild population of Crotalus s. scutulatus (Serpentes: Viperidae). Herpetol. Rev. 37 , 142–144. Google Scholar
76.
Andrade D, Abe A
. 2000 H2o collection by the body in a viperid snake, Bothrops moojeni . Amphibia-Reptilia 21 , 485–492. (doi:ten.1163/156853800300059368) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
77.
Louw GN
. 1972 The function of advective fog in the water economy of certain Namib Desert animals. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 31 , 297–314. Google Scholar
78.
Robinson DA, Hughes Physician
. 1978 Observations on the natural history of Peringuey's adder, Bitis peringueyi (Boulenger) (Reptilia: Viperidae). Annls. Transv. Mus. 31 , 189–193. Google Scholar
79.
Sherbrooke WC
. 1990 Rain-harvesting in the cadger, Phrynosoma cornutum: behavior and integumental morphology. J. Herpetol. 24 , 302–308. (doi:10.2307/1564398) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
fourscore.
Sherbrooke WC
. 2004 Integumental h2o movement and rate of water ingestion during rain harvesting in the Texas horned lizard, Phrynosoma cornutum . Amphibia-Reptilia 25 , 29–39. (doi:10.1163/156853804322992814) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
81.
Comanns P, Buchberger One thousand, Buchsbaum A, Baumgartner R, Kogler A, Bauer South, Baumgartner W
. 2015 Directional, passive liquid transport: the Texas horned lizard as a model for a biomimetic 'liquid diode'. J. R. Soc. Interface 12 , 20150415. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0415) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
82.
Sherbrooke WC
. 2002 Phrynosoma modestum (round-tailed horned lizard) rain-harvest drinking behavior. Herpetol. Rev. 33 , 310–312. Google Scholar
83.
Pianka ER, Parker WS
. 1975 Ecology of horned lizards: a review with special reference to Phrynosoma platyrhinos . Copeia 1975 , 141–162. (doi:x.2307/1442418) Crossref, Google Scholar
84.
Peterson CC
. 1998 Pelting-harvesting behavior past a gratis-ranging desert horned lizard (Phrynosoma platyrhinos). Southwest. Nat. 43 , 391–394. ISI, Google Scholar
85.
Comanns P, Effertz C, Hischen F, Staudt K, Böhme W, Baumgartner West
. 2011 Wet harvesting and water transport through specialized micro-structures on the integument of lizards. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2 , 204–214. (doi:10.3762/bjnano.ii.24) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
86.
Schwenk K, Greene HW
. 1987 H2o drove and drinking in Phrynocephalus helioscopus: a possible condensation machinery. J. Herpetol. 21 , 134–139. (doi:10.2307/1564473) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
87.
Yenmiş G, Ayaz D, Sherbrooke WC, Veselý K
. 2016 A comparative behavioural and structural study of rain-harvesting and not-rain-harvesting agamid lizards of Anatolia (Turkey). Zoomorphology 135 , 137–148. (doi:ten.1007/s00435-015-0285-four) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
88.
Veselý G, Modrý D
. 2002 Pelting-harvesting behavior in agamid lizards (Trapelus). J. Herpetol. 36 , 311–314. (doi:10.1670/0022-1511) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
114.
Sherbrooke WC, Scardino AJ, de Nys R, Schwarzkopf 50
. 2007 Functional morphology of scale hinges used to transport water: convergent drinking adaptations in desert lizards (Moloch horridus and Phrynosoma cornutum). Zoomorphology 126 , 89–102. (doi:10.1007/s00435-007-0031-7) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
89.
Bentley PJ, Blumer WFC
. 1962 Uptake of water by the lizard, Moloch horridus . Nature 194 , 699–700. (doi:10.1038/194699a0) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
90.
Gans C, Merlin R, Blumer WFC
. 1982 The water-collecting mechanism of Moloch horridus re-examined. Amphibia-Reptilia 3 , 57–64. (doi:10.1163/156853882X00167) Crossref, Google Scholar
91.
Sherbrooke WC
. 1993 Rain-drinking behaviors of the Australian thorny devil (Sauria: Agamidae). J. Herpetol. 27 , 270–275. (doi:10.2307/1565147) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
92.
Withers P
. 1993 Cutaneous water acquisition by the thorny devil (Moloch horridus: Agamidae). J. Herpetol. 27 , 265–270. (doi:ten.2307/1565146) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
93.
Ditmars RL
. 1936 Reptiles of the globe . New York, NY: The MacMillan visitor. Google Scholar
94.
Fitzgerald M
. 1983 A annotation on water collection by the disguised dragon Amphibolurus vitticeps . Herpetofauna 14 , 93. Google Scholar
95.
Auffenberg West
. 1963 A annotation on the drinking habits of some land tortoises. Anim. Behav. 11 , 72–73. (doi:10.1016/0003-3472(63)90012-five) Crossref, Google Scholar
96.
Fair JW
. 1970 Comparative rates of rehydration from soil in two species of toads, Bufo boreas and Bufo punctatus . Comp. Biochem. Physiol 34 , 281–287. (doi:10.1016/0010-406X(lxx)90167-2) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
97.
McClanahan L, Baldwin R
. 1969 Rate of water uptake through the integument of the desert toad, Bufo punctatus . Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 28 , 381–389. (doi:10.1016/0010-406X(69)91351-half-dozen) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
98.
Shoemaker VH, Balding D, Ruibal R, McClanahan LL
. 1972 Uricotelism and low evaporative water loss in a South American frog. Science 175 , 1018–1020. (doi:x.1126/scientific discipline.175.4025.1018) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
99.
Norgaard T, Dacke M
. 2010 Fog-basking behaviour and h2o drove efficiency in Namib Desert Darkling beetles. Front. Zool. seven , 23. (doi:10.1186/1742-9994-7-23) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
100.
Gurera D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Designing bioinspired surfaces for water collection from fog. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20180269. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0269) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
101.
Feng West, Bhushan B
. 2020 Multistep wettability gradient in bioinspired triangular patterns for h2o condensation and transport. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 560 , 866–873. (doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.113) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
102.
Gurera D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Optimization of bioinspired conical surfaces for water collection from fog. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 551 , 26–38. (doi:ten.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.015) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
103.
Song D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Water condensation and transport on bioinspired triangular patterns with heterogeneous wettability at a low temperature. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20180335. (doi:ten.1098/rsta.2018.0335) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
104.
Song D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Optimization of bioinspired triangular patterns for water condensation and transport. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20190127. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0127) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
105.
Song D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Bioinspired triangular patterns for water collection from fog. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20190128. (doi:ten.1098/rsta.2019.0128) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
106.
Song D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Enhancement of water drove and transport in bioinspired triangular patterns from combined fog and condensation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 557 , 528–536. (doi:ten.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.068) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
107.
Gurera D, Bhushan B
. 2019 Bioinspired conical design for efficient h2o collection from fog. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20190125. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0125) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
108.
Gurera D, Bhushan B
. 2020 Designing bioinspired conical surfaces for water drove from condensation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 560 , 138–148. (doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.059) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
109.
Schriner CT, Bhushan B
. 2019 H2o droplet dynamics on bioinspired conical surfaces. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377 , 20190118. (doi:ten.1098/rsta.2019.0118) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
110.
Azad MAK, Ellerbrok D, Barthlott Due west, Koch Chiliad
. 2015 Fog collecting biomimetic surfaces: influence of microstructure and wettability. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10 , 016004. (doi:ten.1088/1748-3190/ten/1/016004) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
111.
Garrod RP, Harris LG, Schofield WCE, McGettrick J, Ward LJ, Teare DOH, Badyal JPS
. 2007 Mimicking a Stenocara protrude'due south dorsum for microcondensation using plasmachemical patterned superhydrophobic−superhydrophilic surfaces. Langmuir 23 , 689–693. (doi:10.1021/la0610856) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
112.
Bai H, Wang Fifty, Ju J, Dominicus R, Zheng Y, Jiang 50
. 2014 Efficient water collection on integrative bioinspired surfaces with star-shaped wettability patterns. Adv. Mater. 26 , 5025–5030. (doi:10.1002/adma.201400262) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

Source: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0444

Posted by: wolferemplume.blogspot.com